Skip to content
Magist
AnalyzeRegulationsVendorsCounselUpdatesCompareAbout
← All Controls

Statutory cooling-off / right-of-withdrawal procedure

right-of-withdrawal-procedureDomain: consumer-protectionType: process

Description

A working right-of-withdrawal procedure runs against a regulatory clock that starts when the consumer receives the goods or accepts the digital service, not when the operator's customer-service team gets around to logging the request. The components are a point-of-sale disclosure of the withdrawal period in a durable medium, a standardized model withdrawal form that the consumer can use without drafting their own, a refund-timeline tracker that holds the operator to the statutory window once notice is received, and a digital-content waiver flow for the immediate-execution carve-out where the regime offers one. The period varies in ways that catch operators who assumed one number would work across markets. The EU Consumer Rights Directive and the UK Consumer Contracts Regulations both run 14 days for distance contracts. Brazil's CDC Article 49 runs 7 days; South Korea's e-commerce act sits at 7 days for cooling-off and 3 business days for refund settlement. Japan's Specified Commercial Transactions framework covers a narrower set of triggered transaction types rather than a blanket period. Australia and the UK Consumer Rights Act layer separate major-failure refund remedies on top of (not in place of) the cooling-off entitlement. Operators commonly consolidate to the longest applicable window per market rather than trying to expire the entitlement at the statutory minimum. The carve-out is the operationally interesting piece. The EU CRD Article 16(m) digital-content exception lets a consumer waive the withdrawal right in exchange for immediate execution, but the waiver fails if the consent was not explicit, not contemporaneous with the purchase, and not logged in a form the operator can reproduce. When the waiver fails, the period runs anyway and the refund obligation attaches retroactively, often after the digital content has already been consumed. Evidence formats that hold up include the model withdrawal form template in the form the regulator prescribes, the withdrawal-request log with refund-processing timestamps that show compliance with the per-jurisdiction refund SLA, and the digital-content immediate-execution consent record stored against the user account and the order ID.

Applicability

Applies when: customer segment is b2c or b2b2c.

How predicates are evaluated

Required by (8 regulations)

  • ACL

    Major-failure refund remedies under the consumer guarantees regime (acl-refund-rights).

    Competition and Consumer Act 2010, Schedule 2

  • CDC

    CDC Article 49: 7-day unconditional withdrawal right for distance contracts + Article 26 mandatory product warranty.

    Lei nº 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990 (Código de Defesa do Consumidor), regulated by Decreto nº 7.962, de 15 de março de 2013 (e-commerce provisions)

  • EU CRD

    CRD Article 9-16: 14-day right of withdrawal for distance contracts + digital-content carve-out (Article 16(m)).

    Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

  • Omnibus

    Directive (EU) 2019/2161

  • ASCT

    SCT cooling-off rights for specified transaction types + return / refund disclosure for digital content.

    Act on Specified Commercial Transactions (Act No. 57 of 2000, as amended by Act No. 70 of 2021, effective June 1, 2022)

  • Korea E-Commerce Act

    Act on the Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce Article 17: 7-day cooling-off + Article 18: 3-business-day refund.

    Act on the Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce, etc. (Act No. 6687)

  • UK CCR

    Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013: 14-day cooling-off for distance contracts.

    SI 2013/3134 (Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013)

  • UK CRA

    CRA 2015: digital content quality + repair / replacement / price-reduction remedies for non-conforming digital content.

    Consumer Rights Act 2015, c.15

Fulfilled by (4)

  • shopify · partial · low effort · $$
    Shopify Returns Management + EU Cooling-off app handles request intake + refund automation; merchant supplies SOP + decision logic.
  • loop-returns · partial · low effort · $$
    Loop Returns automates returns + refund workflows; supports EU CRD cooling-off period configuration.
  • narvar · partial · low effort · $$$
    Narvar Returns handles return-policy disclosure + refund tracking with EU/UK/AU localization.
  • In-house build · medium effort
    In-house workflow needs jurisdiction-specific period calculator + refund SLA tracking + digital-content waiver handling.

Magist does not accept payment from vendors. Methodology.

Evidence formats

  • withdrawal form template available to consumers
  • withdrawal-request log + refund processing timestamps
  • internal SOP for cooling-off period start / end calculation
  • digital-content immediate-execution consent record where applicable
  • annual audit of refund-timeline compliance

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions.

Magist

Pre-launch regulatory analysis for product teams. Built by a lawyer, designed for PMs.

Tools

  • Analyze
  • Guided walkthrough
  • Vendors
  • Find counsel
  • Saved analyses

Reference

  • Scope by business model
  • Scope by jurisdiction
  • App ratings
  • Regulations
  • Compare regulations
  • Enforcement
  • Browse Controls
  • Vendor coverage
  • Radar
  • Pulse
  • Changelog
  • Guides
  • Regulatory updates
  • Open data
  • Corpus license
  • Ontology
  • State of Compliance

Solutions

  • For legal teams
  • For engineering
  • For executives
  • For law firms
  • For investors
  • For teams →

About

  • About Magist
  • Methodology
  • Editorial standards
  • Reviewers
  • Coverage status
  • Corrections
  • Trust
  • Coverage scope
  • How we handle data
  • Sub-processors
  • FAQ

Built by Neel Patel, a practicing in-house games attorney. Games touch more compliance domains at once than anything else in tech — Magist was designed around that.

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions. Operated by a Washington-licensed attorney. Not licensed in California or other US states. Magist provides legal information; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone. No vendor, sponsorship, or referral fees, ever.

MethodologyLimitationsDisclosures

© 2026 Magist
TermsLicensePrivacySecurityLinkedIn