Skip to content
Magist
AnalyzeRegulationsVendorsCounselUpdatesCompareAbout
← All Controls

Trader traceability database

trader-traceability-databaseDomain: marketplace-platformType: in-house

Description

A trader traceability database is a queryable inventory that maps each product or listing on a marketplace to its responsible trader, the trader's identification, the trader's address, and (for products falling under the EU product-safety regime) the economic-operator information that gives an EU-resident point of contact for product-safety enforcement. The components are a data model that links listings to traders durably, a query surface that authorities can use without bespoke integration work for each request, a retention policy that keeps the link available for the regulatory window even after a listing is taken down, and an SLA dashboard against the per-regulator response window. The regulatory frame comes from two converging regimes. DSA Article 31 imposes the traceability obligation on online platforms that allow consumers to contract with third-party traders, sitting atop the Article 30 KYBC dataset. EU GPSR Article 22(7-8) layers the trader-information schema and the cooperation-with-authority-investigations obligation on top, particularly for products covered by the product-safety regimes. EU Market Surveillance Regulation 2019/1020 carries the economic-operator concept that extends product-safety responsibility into the online sales channel. National market-surveillance bodies, customs, and the European Commission for DSA-designated platforms each have a right to query the database on demand, typically within a fixed window measured in days rather than weeks. The recurring difficulty is link stability. Products that are relisted, cloned, merged, or moved between trader accounts tend to lose their trader association unless the data model treats the trader-product link as a first-class entity rather than as a foreign-key annotation on the listing. The pattern that holds up under authority query treats the trader-listing association as an immutable historical fact (with edits creating new rows rather than mutating old ones) and indexes the database so a single-trader query returns every listing the trader has ever owned, not only the live inventory. Evidence formats that hold up include the published traceability database schema with the trader-listing relationship documented, the authority-query SLA dashboard showing the per-request response time against the regulatory window, and the sample authority-response packet that demonstrates the actual query result format the platform delivers.

Applicability

Applies when: business model role is intermediary or mixed.

How predicates are evaluated

Required by (2 regulations)

  • DSA

    Article 31 — traceability of traders.

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Digital Services Act)

  • EU GPSR

    Article 22(7-8) — trader-information schema retained and disclosed to market-surveillance authorities on request; cooperation with authority investigations under Article 22(8).

    Regulation (EU) 2023/988

    Source →

Fulfilled by (1)

  • In-house build · high effort
    Standard marketplace-platform engineering build; no off-the-shelf vendor covers the full obligation.

Magist does not accept payment from vendors. Methodology.

Evidence formats

  • traceability database schema
  • authority-query SLA dashboard

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions.

Magist

Pre-launch regulatory analysis for product teams. Built by a lawyer, designed for PMs.

Tools

  • Analyze
  • Guided walkthrough
  • Vendors
  • Find counsel
  • Saved analyses

Reference

  • Scope by business model
  • Scope by jurisdiction
  • App ratings
  • Regulations
  • Compare regulations
  • Enforcement
  • Browse Controls
  • Vendor coverage
  • Radar
  • Pulse
  • Changelog
  • Guides
  • Regulatory updates
  • Open data
  • Corpus license
  • Ontology
  • State of Compliance

Solutions

  • For legal teams
  • For engineering
  • For executives
  • For law firms
  • For investors
  • For teams →

About

  • About Magist
  • Methodology
  • Editorial standards
  • Reviewers
  • Coverage status
  • Corrections
  • Trust
  • Coverage scope
  • How we handle data
  • Sub-processors
  • FAQ

Built by Neel Patel, a practicing in-house games attorney. Games touch more compliance domains at once than anything else in tech — Magist was designed around that.

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions. Operated by a Washington-licensed attorney. Not licensed in California or other US states. Magist provides legal information; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone. No vendor, sponsorship, or referral fees, ever.

MethodologyLimitationsDisclosures

© 2026 Magist
TermsLicensePrivacySecurityLinkedIn