Skip to content
Magist
AnalyzeRegulationsVendorsCounselUpdatesCompareAbout
Magist

Pre-launch regulatory analysis for product teams. Built by a lawyer, designed for PMs.

Tools

  • Analyze
  • Guided walkthrough
  • Vendors
  • Find counsel
  • Saved analyses

Reference

  • Scope by business model
  • Scope by jurisdiction
  • App ratings
  • Regulations
  • Compare regulations
  • Enforcement
  • Browse Controls
  • Vendor coverage
  • Radar
  • Pulse
  • Changelog
  • Guides
  • Regulatory updates
  • Open data
  • Corpus license
  • Ontology
  • State of Compliance

Solutions

  • For legal teams
  • For engineering
  • For executives
  • For law firms
  • For investors
  • For teams →

About

  • About Magist
  • Methodology
  • Editorial standards
  • Reviewers
  • Coverage status
  • Corrections
  • Trust
  • Coverage scope
  • How we handle data
  • Sub-processors
  • FAQ

Built by Neel Patel, a practicing in-house games attorney. Games touch more compliance domains at once than anything else in tech — Magist was designed around that.

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions. Operated by a Washington-licensed attorney. Not licensed in California or other US states. Magist provides legal information; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone. No vendor, sponsorship, or referral fees, ever.

MethodologyLimitationsDisclosures

© 2026 Magist
TermsLicensePrivacySecurityLinkedIn
✦AI-assisted

Controls

  • Third-party / vendor risk assessment program

    Third-party and vendor risk assessment program for evaluating operational, compliance, and security risks in supply chains and service providers.

  • Algorithmic impact assessment for consequential decisions

    Algorithmic impact assessment for consequential automated decisions to identify potential harms and compliance gaps.

  • Data protection impact assessment (DPIA) process

    Data protection impact assessment (DPIA) process to evaluate privacy and security risks of data processing activities.

  • Bias audit and impact-ratio testing for automated decisions

    Bias audit and impact-ratio testing for automated decisions to assess fairness and discriminatory outcomes.

  • Incident response plan

    Incident response plan documenting detection, escalation, and remediation procedures for security and compliance breaches.

  • Security update provision and defined support period

    Security update provision and defined support period to manage cybersecurity vulnerabilities and product safety risks.

  • AI system disclosure to end users

    AI system disclosure to end users to inform consumers about automated decision-making and algorithmic systems in use.

Regulations

  • EU Artificial Intelligence Act

    EU Artificial Intelligence Act establishes risk-based classification system (high-risk, limited-risk, minimal-risk) requiring impact assessments and governance controls.

  • General Data Protection Regulation

    GDPR requires risk assessments for automated processing, profiling, and high-risk data transfers; accountability through documented compliance activities.

  • EU Network and Information Security Directive (NIS2)

    EU Network and Information Security Directive (NIS2) requires risk management and security assessment frameworks for critical infrastructure operators and essential services.

This is based on Magist's regulatory data, not legal advice. Verify with counsel for your specific situation.