Skip to content
Magist
AnalyzeRegulationsVendorsCounselUpdatesCompareAbout
Magist

Pre-launch regulatory analysis for product teams. Built by a lawyer, designed for PMs.

Tools

  • Analyze
  • Guided walkthrough
  • Vendors
  • Find counsel
  • Saved analyses

Reference

  • Scope by business model
  • Scope by jurisdiction
  • App ratings
  • Regulations
  • Compare regulations
  • Enforcement
  • Browse Controls
  • Vendor coverage
  • Radar
  • Pulse
  • Changelog
  • Guides
  • Regulatory updates
  • Open data
  • Corpus license
  • Ontology
  • State of Compliance

Solutions

  • For legal teams
  • For engineering
  • For executives
  • For law firms
  • For investors
  • For teams →

About

  • About Magist
  • Methodology
  • Editorial standards
  • Reviewers
  • Coverage status
  • Corrections
  • Trust
  • Coverage scope
  • How we handle data
  • Sub-processors
  • FAQ

Built by Neel Patel, a practicing in-house games attorney. Games touch more compliance domains at once than anything else in tech — Magist was designed around that.

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions. Operated by a Washington-licensed attorney. Not licensed in California or other US states. Magist provides legal information; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone. No vendor, sponsorship, or referral fees, ever.

MethodologyLimitationsDisclosures

© 2026 Magist
TermsLicensePrivacySecurityLinkedIn
✦AI-assisted

Regulations

  • California AB 2013: Generative Artificial Intelligence Training Data Transparency

    Requires generative AI systems to disclose training data sources and publish transparency reports on model development.

  • California SB 942: California AI Transparency Act

    California AI Transparency Act mandating disclosure of AI system use and algorithmic decision-making to consumers.

  • Act on Improving Transparency and Fairness of Digital Platforms

    Act on Improving Transparency and Fairness of Digital Platforms requiring platforms to disclose algorithmic ranking and recommendation practices.

  • Digital Services Act

    Digital Services Act requires very large online platforms to publish annual risk assessment reports and algorithmic transparency documentation.

  • EU Platform-to-Business Regulation 2019/1150

    Platform-to-Business Regulation mandates transparency in ranking systems, algorithmic decision-making, and business-user terms.

  • EU Artificial Intelligence Act

    EU AI Act requires transparency in high-risk AI systems, including documentation, impact assessments, and user notifications.

  • FTC Guidance on Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Discrimination in Advertising

    FTC guidance on algorithmic discrimination and AI use in advertising requiring transparency and substantiation of claims.

Controls

  • AI training data documentation and disclosure

    AI training data documentation and disclosure program to satisfy transparency and audit requirements.

  • Algorithmic recommendation transparency program

    Algorithmic recommendation transparency program enabling disclosure of ranking parameters and recommendation criteria.

  • Platform-reporting program (DAC7 / 1099-K)

    Platform-reporting program (DAC7 / 1099-K) for tax and transaction transparency across jurisdictions.

This is based on Magist's regulatory data, not legal advice. Verify with counsel for your specific situation.