Skip to content
Magist
AnalyzeRegulationsVendorsCounselUpdatesCompareAbout
Home/By vertical/Sustainability & ESG claims

Regulatory scoping for sustainability and ESG marketing claims

Environmental and sustainability marketing claims are increasingly treated as representations that must be substantiated — and, in the EU, several claim types are moving toward outright prohibition. The binding EU instrument is the Empowering Consumers Directive; the FTC Green Guides set the US substantiation expectation; the standalone Green Claims Directive proposal stalled in 2025.

Green-claim substantiationSustainability labelsCarbon-neutral claimsConsumer protection

Regulations Magist tracks for this vertical

  • EU Empowering Consumers →
  • FTC Green Guides →
  • EU Green Claims Directive →

Coverage of these newer regimes is published as draft and reviewed on a rolling basis.

Questions that determine your footprint

  • Do you make generic green claims ("eco-friendly", "green")?

    The EU Empowering Consumers Directive can prohibit generic environmental claims unless backed by recognized excellent performance, and the FTC Green Guides expect competent and reliable evidence behind objective claims.

  • Do you claim carbon neutrality via offsets?

    The EU Empowering Consumers Directive moves toward prohibiting carbon-neutrality claims based solely on offsetting, so for that claim the fix can be to stop making it rather than to document it better.

  • Do you display a sustainability label?

    Self-created or private labels not based on a certification scheme or established by a public authority can be restricted under the EU rules, so label provenance is worth scoping.

See exactly which of 155+ regulations apply to your sustainability & esg claims product.

Run your analysis →

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone.

Magist provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney.

Magist

Pre-launch regulatory analysis for product teams. Built by a lawyer, designed for PMs.

Tools

  • Analyze
  • Guided walkthrough
  • Vendors
  • Find counsel
  • Saved analyses

Reference

  • Scope by business model
  • Scope by jurisdiction
  • App ratings
  • Regulations
  • Compare regulations
  • Enforcement
  • Browse Controls
  • Vendor coverage
  • Radar
  • Pulse
  • Changelog
  • Guides
  • Regulatory updates
  • Open data
  • Corpus license
  • Ontology
  • State of Compliance

Solutions

  • For legal teams
  • For engineering
  • For executives
  • For law firms
  • For investors
  • For teams →

About

  • About Magist
  • Methodology
  • Editorial standards
  • Reviewers
  • Coverage status
  • Corrections
  • Trust
  • Coverage scope
  • How we handle data
  • Sub-processors
  • FAQ

Built by Neel Patel, a practicing in-house games attorney. Games touch more compliance domains at once than anything else in tech — Magist was designed around that.

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions. Operated by a Washington-licensed attorney. Not licensed in California or other US states. Magist provides legal information; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone. No vendor, sponsorship, or referral fees, ever.

MethodologyLimitationsDisclosures

© 2026 Magist
TermsLicensePrivacySecurityLinkedIn