Skip to content
Magist
AnalyzeRegulationsVendorsCounselUpdatesCompareAbout
Home/By vertical/Reproductive-health & sensitive data

Regulatory scoping for reproductive-health and sensitive consumer data

This vertical is about one thing: the privacy obligations that attach to consumer health data collected outside the HIPAA perimeter. Washington’s My Health My Data Act defines consumer health data broadly enough to reach location data and algorithmically inferred health status, which sweeps in adtech, SDK, and analytics businesses. Magist scopes the data-privacy obligations only and makes no statement about the underlying medical or legal questions.

Consumer health dataSeparate consentGeofencing limitsDeletion rights

Regulations Magist tracks for this vertical

  • Washington MHMDA →

Coverage of these newer regimes is published as draft and reviewed on a rolling basis.

Questions that determine your footprint

  • Could your data reveal a consumer’s health status?

    Washington’s My Health My Data Act can treat precise location data that could indicate an attempt to acquire health services, and health status inferred from other data, as consumer health data — even for businesses that do not consider themselves health companies.

  • Do you run advertising or analytics SDKs?

    SDK and location-data collection without separate consent is the leading theory in the early My Health My Data Act class actions, so an SDK audit can be a sensible scoping step.

  • Do you have separate consent and a standalone health-data policy?

    The Act can require separate consent to collect, a separate authorization to sell, and a standalone consumer-health-data privacy policy distinct from the general one.

See exactly which of 155+ regulations apply to your reproductive-health & sensitive data product.

Run your analysis →

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone.

Magist provides legal information, not legal advice. Consult a licensed attorney.

Magist

Pre-launch regulatory analysis for product teams. Built by a lawyer, designed for PMs.

Tools

  • Analyze
  • Guided walkthrough
  • Vendors
  • Find counsel
  • Saved analyses

Reference

  • Scope by business model
  • Scope by jurisdiction
  • App ratings
  • Regulations
  • Compare regulations
  • Enforcement
  • Browse Controls
  • Vendor coverage
  • Radar
  • Pulse
  • Changelog
  • Guides
  • Regulatory updates
  • Open data
  • Corpus license
  • Ontology
  • State of Compliance

Solutions

  • For legal teams
  • For engineering
  • For executives
  • For law firms
  • For investors
  • For teams →

About

  • About Magist
  • Methodology
  • Editorial standards
  • Reviewers
  • Coverage status
  • Corrections
  • Trust
  • Coverage scope
  • How we handle data
  • Sub-processors
  • FAQ

Built by Neel Patel, a practicing in-house games attorney. Games touch more compliance domains at once than anything else in tech — Magist was designed around that.

Magist provides legal information based on publicly available regulatory sources. It does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before making compliance decisions. Operated by a Washington-licensed attorney. Not licensed in California or other US states. Magist provides legal information; consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

Magist is an instrument, not a consultancy. It does not sell compliance services or take payment from vendors for placement; the analysis is the same for everyone. No vendor, sponsorship, or referral fees, ever.

MethodologyLimitationsDisclosures

© 2026 Magist
TermsLicensePrivacySecurityLinkedIn